User talk:T1v37r

Leeds United A.F.C. Chairmen

With regards to the page you have created Leeds United A.F.C. Chairmen. I don't know whether you already knew this but the category Category:Chairmen of Leeds United AFC exists and has a bigger list than the one you have created (although lacking dates). I wondered, if you agreed, if I could nominate the page for deletion and move the table on the page to the category and then link to the category page on the main leeds page, it would make more sense in my opinion for such a small amount of info. Information on the individuals reigns as chairman of Leeds could then be stored on their own pages. Let me know what you think. --Chappy84 17:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond, if you check my talk page I discussed major Leeds United additions/alterations with other users before making the alterations. Also see here, Bill Fotherby was a chairman of Leeds United. Chappy84 18:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Preview button

Please use it more when editing, rather than just updating the page. It makes it more difficult to track specific edits. - Dudesleeper 20:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, will do in future! Just regarding Alastair Mackenzie, he is credited as 'Alastair Mackenzie' on the show, so any references to him on Wikipedia regarding MOTG, I have put as 'Alastair Mackenzie' - User:t1v37r 20:48, 12 January 2007 (GMT)

Yep, I noticed the piped links. I'd redirected the MacKenzie article back to Mackenzie, probably not the done way, but there it is. - Dudesleeper 00:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jonathan_Howson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jonathan_Howson.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer Section on Leeds United

I know there has been a transfer section in previous summers on the Leeds United page but unfortunately they're not considered encyclopaedic or part of football articles that reach featured article status so I've removed it. Chappy84 20:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds Player of the Year

Just thought I'd let you know. I've reverted your edit to the above as Eddie Lewis has infact been voted fans player of the year, not club player of the year and this list is club player of the year. Chappy • T • C • 17:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

apologies, arfter searching through the the leeds web-site for last years player of the year it turns out the fans do pick it. - http://www.leedsunited.com/page/NewsroomDetail/0,,10273~901227,00.html , thought fans picked theirs and the club picked another. anyway i've re-added your edit, and apologies for the mix-up.Chappy • T • C • 20:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dracocrabbegoylepansy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dracocrabbegoylepansy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 02:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Denied

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Denied, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 14:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Dawson (actor)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Andrew Dawson (actor), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 14:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Holly Mann

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Holly Mann, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 14:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:ArchieMacD.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ArchieMacD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DeniedTeaserPoster.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DeniedTeaserPoster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Core desat 04:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dracocrabbegoylepansy.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dracocrabbegoylepansy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Jessmackenzie.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jessmackenzie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Maureenmaclean.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Maureenmaclean.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lizzieandmartha.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lizzieandmartha.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:LexieMacDonald.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LexieMacDonald.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lucyford.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lucyford.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lordkilwillie.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lordkilwillie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Stellamoon.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Stellamoon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:34, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds United A.F.C. Trialists

Hi, I just thought I'd let you know I've removed the trialists section on the Leeds page. This is because they're never actually on the clubs books as a registered player during the trial period and as such are never part of club statistics therefore there isn't really a need for them to be mentioned in the article, even if we subsequently sign a few after eventually coming out of administration. Chappy ^T_C 07:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds United A.F.C. Squad

Hi, I was just wondering why you updated the date on the squad to the 15th from the 13th when you removed the erroneous text? The last time the squad changed was on the 13th hence this should really be the date that is shown until any further transfers/signings occur. Chappy ^T_C 09:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Alicia comparison.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alicia comparison.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Adrian Pucey.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adrian Pucey.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Angelina_comparison.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Angelina_comparison.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Alicia comparison.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alicia comparison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Borgin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Borgin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ernieprang.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ernieprang.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Slightlycreepyboy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Slightlycreepyboy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds United 2007-08 season

Hi, as a regular editor of the Leeds United wikipedia page, I just wanted to ask your advice on a matter. I found this page on FC Barcelona's 2007-08 season and was thinking of creating similiar page for Leeds? I can see no reason not to if other teams can have them, despite I suppose us being a team in a lower league although we definitely have the number of supporters that a Premier League or La Liga team would! t1v37r 19:23, 31 July 2007 (GMT)

Hi, erm yeah, These pages do keep on cropping up. The problem with them is that people start them with the intentions of keeping them up-to date but in the end they stay un-finished. There are a whole series of articles for each county cricket side for the 2005 season (see Yorkshire's Here) however the person whom created these didn't feel the inkling to create one's for the 2006 or 2007 seasons. There is a wiki-project dedicated to Football and football articles and the consensus on there was to advise against them due to the fact that most remain un-finished and in a few years they won't be really required or read by users. I would however on the positive side say that they are informative articles. people looking back may want to find this information out, I would just say that if you do want to create this article make sure you are dedicated to it as especially since we are a division two side now few if any people will be with you in providing frequent edits (with more editors than not probably just editing to add vandalism if their team beats us). I myself try to keep the main page and history page up-to date with major events and, although impossible to balance the information, in proportion as much as possible to previous decades. I've been, meaning to increase the amount of information on the revie era, as a lot of information is available on fan sites, but I have never got round to it. Also although unlikely that we won't, its not certain that we'll have a 2007-08 season at the moment so if you are going to create this article it might be an idea to hang of just until we're given that all important golden share back (which I'm begging we are, even though we're so ill prepared I think it may result in yet another relegation battle). Sorry if all that's a little negative against the creation it's just personal opinion from seeing previous similar aricles lagg behind and become beyond the point where it requires a reasonable amount of effort to get back up-to date. Chappy ^T_C 20:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right okay I get what you're saying. I may make a start in the next few days and put it up once we get the share (fingers crossed!!!). Cheers for the advice. t1v37r 21:51, 31 July 2007 (GMT)

In theory it's a great idea, though it may be harder in practise. Nonetheless, should you decide to go ahead I'm more than happy to give you a hand in reverting vandalism and keeping it up to date. MOT Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 22:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to create the code and then move it if we get the share then just create it as a sub-page of your user page, i.e. at User:T1v37r/Leeds United A.F.C. 2007-08 season. will make it easier for you rather than saving the code on your own P.C. That way you can do all you would be able to with a normal page. p.s. Happy Yorkshire Day Chappy ^T_C 11:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on the Squad Information you have on your 2007-08 page. Some of the players you have as coming in for a Free I seem to remember coming in for at-least nominal fees. We definately paid weldstone and barnet for beckford and kandol (think they were both under £100k each), douglas' page states that he moved for an undisclosed fee (and is referenced so you can use that reference). Also try to link to the actual page and not re-directs. The Eddie Lewis link goes to a disambiguation page, and links such as Leeds United should at-least use the Template:afc or Template:fc links, try to check the name of the page the club is under and then use the appropriate template. Also just a note on nationalities, I'd use the Template:citeweb for atleast richardson playing for scotland internationally as some may question it since scotland is not mentioned on his wikipedia page. Chappy ^T_C 12:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the advice, Chappy84. I have sorted out the Lewis link... I checked Douglas/Beckford/Kandol (how could we pay money for him!?!?!) and confirmed they are undisclosed fees. All now corrected. Richardson... I'm sure he is Scottish, despite being in Rotherham, will try find a reference on the net somewhere. Will try and correct as many of the re-directs as I can, same with the the template:afc for Leeds United... any other advice at all? as much as possible would be welcome!!! One question, do you have any idea how to access the template regarding EU players? And also do you have any clue about the English rules for EU players - I don't myself... Regarding new stuff on the page, I obviously can't do the kit cos we don't have any sponsors or have a clue what the new kit is gonna be like. I'm gonna have a go at putting in the info about competitive matches sometime in the near future, then go on to Squad Stats. T1v37r, 2 August 2007, 15:41 GMT

The english rules on EU players will most probably be the general EU laws on employment within the european union, i.e. if you're a citizen of a member state you can work in any other member state, outside the european union I think the rule is you have to have played in 75% of your countries A class matches to get a work permit. As for the EU player template, not quite sure what this is. One of [1] these might be it but if not try asking on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football, someone on there should be able to help you. Regarding the kit, sponsors won't change it as wikipedia can't sanction the use of sponsor images on examples of kits and any on wikipedia will be removed. As for the kit designs, we're still using last seasons at the mo so just use the ones from the main page until the club releases new designs , if they are even in the process of doing so. Chappy ^T_C 14:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try looking at all the season links from the Boro template Template:Middlesbrough_F.C.. They may help. Chappy ^T_C 12:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now this page has become a proper article, you may want to consider a Speedy_deletion of User:T1v37r/Leeds United A.F.C. 2007-08 season. As it's under your user page it qualifies for speedy deletion if you request it. Chappy ^T_C 17:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, yep have just done so. Thanks. T1v37r, 10 August 2007, 18:59 GMT

Image source problem with Image:Dumbledoreharris1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Dumbledoreharris1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 17:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dumbledoreharris1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dumbledoreharris1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 17:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New columns in Fb templates

Hi, I just like to tell you that new columns could be add to any template. But, in order to not interfere in other articles that use the same templates and do not want to use it, new columns could be optional, like the Scorers column. If you have a need for a new column and do not fill comfort changing the templates yourself, please discuss it in the template's talk page. New columns and changes could be useful for other articles. Regards. --ClaudioMB 16:57, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Necros-jamesbond.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Necros-jamesbond.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 05:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer fee column sorting

The column is sort as a text, not as a value. "." comes before letters, so "1.5m" comes before "1m". My immediately solution is when one player uses ".", all other should also use. I already did the change.--ClaudioMB 03:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Free and Youth system order

"Youth system" be order lower than "Free" will be not easy, because Y comes after F. I'll try a solution later.--ClaudioMB 04:05, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Squad limitation in England

About squad limit note, here the template Template:Fb pl ENG 2007. I placed that note wondering if there is such limitation in England like in Spain (25 players). I forgot to place a question on the Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football. If there isn't such thing in England, the note could be erased.--ClaudioMB 04:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice ClaudioMB, have edited the template saying "Squad size is unlimited". As far I know, the squad can be as small or large as the club wants. --t1v37r 08:28, 28 August 2007 (GMT)

References

If possible can you try to use Cite web when creating references. I have altered the references you created on Filipe da Costa and Gylfi Einarsson to use cite web so if you need examples of how to use them see these pages or the ultiple used on the main Leeds United A.F.C. or Leeds United A.F.C. History Pages. I'm just trying to help keep the standards through Wikipedia. Cheers. Chappy ^T_C 10:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, will do in future.t1v37r 12:39, 1 September 2007

TfD nomination of Template:MOTGCharacter

Template:MOTGCharacter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. – Black Falcon ^(Talk) 17:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style for club season articles

As you have often contribute to club season articles, I believe this and this are pretty much of your interest.--ClaudioMB 16:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds Reserve Players

Hi T1v37r. Unfortunately due to notability requirements the three articles (Duane Grace, Stefan Connor, and Andrew Milne) you have created for the Leeds reserve team aren't allowed on Wikipedia and are going to have to be nominated for deletion. If you nominate these for speedy deletion then we will avoid an AfD discussion, however otherwise they will go through one and due to no appearances in a fully professional league (this excludes youth and reserve leagues) they do not fullfill the requirements for notability on WP:Football. Chappy ^T_C 11:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chappy84. Okay, that's fine. Just a question though, there are numerous other player pages of players who have not played for the senior team. Eg, Jonathan Lund, Simon Madden, Gavin Rothery etc, how come they haven't been deleted? Is it cos they are have signed pro deals? Ross Wilkinson hasn't signed a pro deal or played pro footy...? T1v37r, 24 September 2007, 13:28 GMT

The reason is simply that people haven't nominated them for AfD's yet, they should have been. Also some people re-create the page after its deleteion as a result of an AfD, as they feel the player requires a page. It's unfortunately a never ending battle to keep only notable articles on wikipedia. Chappy

^T_C 14:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've created an AfD entry for the players you haven't already nominated for speedy deletion. Please feel free to provide your view-point on the entry. Chappy

^T_C 19:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Fb cm LUFC header

Template:Fb cm LUFC header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Balloonguy 21:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds United A.F.C. season 2007-08

Hi there, I was just wondering whether the squad information seciton is supposed to include all appearances and goals rather than simply league ones, as most articles do. Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 17:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Amanda MacLeish

An editor has nominated Amanda MacLeish, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda MacLeish and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IonaMaclean.jpg

I have tagged Image:IonaMaclean.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LancelotFleming.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LancelotFleming.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GollyMackenzie.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GollyMackenzie.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Rose

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Danny Rose, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PCCallumMcIntyre.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:PCCallumMcIntyre.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fb cm2 match

Sorry for the long delay. I was not using Wikipedia for while and I should have post a sign about that. Anyway, I fixed the problem. Thanks for mention it to me, because other pages also use the same template. Regards. --ClaudioMB (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MollyMacDonald.jpg

I have tagged Image:MollyMacDonald.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

League One Play-offs

My PoV is that:

1) Results by round should show only the 46 regular league matches;

2) Competitive should show any competitive match, including the playoffs. The competition template for this playoff already exist: Football League One Playoffs;

3) Create a Playoff subsection for Leeds_United_A.F.C._season_2007-08#League_One showing the playoffs matches, just like this The_Football_League_2007-08#Football_League_One.

I hope I could help. --ClaudioMB (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help with template Fb notice

Hi, could you help me with this Template:Fb notice? I've placed it on Talk:Leeds United A.F.C. season 2007-08 and I'm planing to place it on all articles that use Fb templates. Is that a good thing? Is the text clear and grammatically right? Please, feel free to change anything in the template. Thanks in advance. --ClaudioMB (talk) 13:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PaulBowman-MacDonald.jpg

I have tagged Image:PaulBowman-MacDonald.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Salacious crumb.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Salacious crumb.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fb disc footer

I'm copying from the teams' records. So, I'm not sure if they consider a second yellow card as another yellow (it's not clear) or only sent off after 2 yellows. I PoV is that a second yellow card should count as one more yellow card (a booking is a booking) and a sent off after a second yellow card. --ClaudioMB (talk) 14:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Footballbox

Does this look okay? ugen64 (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK - I updated the template itself, you should be able to add the round now. ugen64 (talk) 00:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Lufc2008-09new.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lufc2008-09new.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 14:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Leeds United A.F.C. Reserves and Youth Team season 2008-09

I have nominated Leeds United A.F.C. Reserves and Youth Team season 2008-09, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leeds United A.F.C. Reserves and Youth Team season 2008-09. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Peanut4 (talk) 11:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Casper Ankergren.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Casper Ankergren.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds United 2008–09 average attendance

I make it a total of 639,782 from 28 games, which gives an average of 22,849. Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 16:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb ss header

Thanks for warning me about those changes. I have seen lots of people improving FB templates, but those last two changes were removing functions. Regards. --ClaudioMB (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed, summer and winter

This discussion may interest you. --ClaudioMB (talk) 19:37, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb cm LUFC match

Template:Fb cm LUFC match has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello T1v37r! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Kari Corbett - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MegPaterson&GollyMackenzie.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MegPaterson&GollyMackenzie.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Leeds United A.F.C. personnel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Leeds United A.F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phil Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Leeds United A.F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie Taylor (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Watto.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Watto.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Monarch of the Glen

Template:Monarch of the Glen has been nominated for merging with Template:MOTG characters. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Leeds United A.F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian McDermott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leeds United A.F.C. personnel

The article Leeds United A.F.C. personnel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure WP:LISTCRUFT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 19:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, T1v37r. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, T1v37r. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Manuel Rui Marques.jpg

The file File:Manuel Rui Marques.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb mfs LUFC footer

Template:Fb mfs LUFC footer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 12:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb cs ex footer

Template:Fb cs ex footer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb cs ex header

Template:Fb cs ex header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb cs ex staff

Template:Fb cs ex staff has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of characters in Monarch of the Glen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of characters in Monarch of the Glen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in Monarch of the Glen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jontesta (talk) 02:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]